linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] introduce probe_slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1414475309.8574.8.camel@tkhai>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:48:29 +0300
From:	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] introduce probe_slab_address()

В Вт, 28/10/2014 в 08:44 +0300, Kirill Tkhai пишет:
> В Пн, 27/10/2014 в 20:54 +0100, Oleg Nesterov пишет:
> > Extract the ifdef(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) code from get_freepointer_safe()
> > into the new generic helper, probe_slab_address(). The next patch will add
> > another user.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/uaccess.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
> >  mm/slub.c               |    6 +-----
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> > index effb637..3367396 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> > @@ -71,6 +71,21 @@ static inline unsigned long __copy_from_user_nocache(void *to,
> >  	__probe_kernel_read(&(retval), (__force void *)(addr), sizeof(retval))
> >  
> >  /*
> > + * Same as probe_kernel_address(), but @addr must be the valid pointer
> > + * to a slab object, potentially freed/reused/unmapped.
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > +#define probe_slab_address(addr, retval)	\
> > +	probe_kernel_address(addr, retval)
> > +#else
> > +#define probe_slab_address(addr, retval)	\
> > +	({							\
> > +		(retval) = *(typeof(retval) *)(addr);		\
> > +		0;						\
> > +	})
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +/*
> >   * probe_kernel_read(): safely attempt to read from a location
> >   * @dst: pointer to the buffer that shall take the data
> >   * @src: address to read from
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 3e8afcc..0467d22 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -265,11 +265,7 @@ static inline void *get_freepointer_safe(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> >  {
> >  	void *p;
> >  
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > -	probe_kernel_read(&p, (void **)(object + s->offset), sizeof(p));
> > -#else
> > -	p = get_freepointer(s, object);
> > -#endif
> > +	probe_slab_address(object + s->offset, p);
> >  	return p;
> >  }
> >  
> 
> probe_kernel_read() was arch-dependent on tree platforms:

Of course, I mean get_freepointer_safe() used to use arch-dependent
probe_kernel_read() on blackfin, parisc and um.

> arch/blackfin/mm/maccess.c
> arch/parisc/lib/memcpy.c
> arch/um/kernel/maccess.c
> 
> But now we skip these arch-dependent implementations. Is there no a problem?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/