linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] dt-bindings: Document the standard property "system-power-controller"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABgxDo+goYskzGB5uCTkteOs5=6+vRbYCABMh8D_3qZxQC0thA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:25:55 +0100
From:	Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, robh <robh@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"pawel.moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] dt-bindings: Document the standard property "system-power-controller"

If this is possible, that's probably better to drop all these patches
(including poweroff-source) from "next", in this way it will be
possible to re-do things properly from scratch (with the new name).

If you have a look at linux-next the property "poweroff-source" is
already used by tps910 AND act8865, I don't like that (it is not used
yet by dts files). I mean, I don't really want to support
"vendor,system-power-controller", "system-power-controller" and
"poweroff-source" from "of_has_system_power_source" and do a lot of
unclean commits in order to don't break compatibility. Just keep
things simple.

What do you think ?


2014-10-27 18:57 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:30:25PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:26:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Given that poweroff-source hasn't made it into a released kernel yet we
>> > can probably just kill it off completely can't we?
>
>> please do, then we will never have that commit in Linus' tree to give us
>> nightmares.
>
> Well, the commit isn't a particularly big deal (and got cross-merged
> into another tree already) - if it's convenient to rebase it out we
> probably should but it's also not the end of the world either so long as
> it doesn't appear in a release.  Worst case people adopt it based on the
> list discussions and we check for two properties which also isn't that
> bad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/