linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 022/127] HID: rmi: check sanity of the incoming report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141028033421.893876559@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:34:17 +0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 022/127] HID: rmi: check sanity of the incoming report

3.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>

commit 5b65c2a0296644dd3dbdd590d6f00174d18c96b3 upstream.

In the Dell XPS 13 9333, it appears that sometimes the bus get confused
and corrupts the incoming data. It fills the input report with the
sentinel value "ff". Synaptics told us that such behavior does not comes
from the touchpad itself, so we filter out such reports here.

Unfortunately, we can not simply discard the incoming data because they
may contain useful information. Most of the time, the misbehavior is
quite near the end of the report, so we can still use the valid part of
it.

Fixes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123584

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
@@ -320,10 +320,7 @@ static int rmi_f11_input_event(struct hi
 	int offset;
 	int i;
 
-	if (size < hdata->f11.report_size)
-		return 0;
-
-	if (!(irq & hdata->f11.irq_mask))
+	if (!(irq & hdata->f11.irq_mask) || size <= 0)
 		return 0;
 
 	offset = (hdata->max_fingers >> 2) + 1;
@@ -332,9 +329,19 @@ static int rmi_f11_input_event(struct hi
 		int fs_bit_position = (i & 0x3) << 1;
 		int finger_state = (data[fs_byte_position] >> fs_bit_position) &
 					0x03;
+		int position = offset + 5 * i;
+
+		if (position + 5 > size) {
+			/* partial report, go on with what we received */
+			printk_once(KERN_WARNING
+				"%s %s: Detected incomplete finger report. Finger reports may occasionally get dropped on this platform.\n",
+				 dev_driver_string(&hdev->dev),
+				 dev_name(&hdev->dev));
+			hid_dbg(hdev, "Incomplete finger report\n");
+			break;
+		}
 
-		rmi_f11_process_touch(hdata, i, finger_state,
-				&data[offset + 5 * i]);
+		rmi_f11_process_touch(hdata, i, finger_state, &data[position]);
 	}
 	input_mt_sync_frame(hdata->input);
 	input_sync(hdata->input);
@@ -352,6 +359,11 @@ static int rmi_f30_input_event(struct hi
 	if (!(irq & hdata->f30.irq_mask))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (size < (int)hdata->f30.report_size) {
+		hid_warn(hdev, "Click Button pressed, but the click data is missing\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < hdata->gpio_led_count; i++) {
 		if (test_bit(i, &hdata->button_mask)) {
 			value = (data[i / 8] >> (i & 0x07)) & BIT(0);
@@ -412,9 +424,29 @@ static int rmi_read_data_event(struct hi
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int rmi_check_sanity(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *data, int size)
+{
+	int valid_size = size;
+	/*
+	 * On the Dell XPS 13 9333, the bus sometimes get confused and fills
+	 * the report with a sentinel value "ff". Synaptics told us that such
+	 * behavior does not comes from the touchpad itself, so we filter out
+	 * such reports here.
+	 */
+
+	while ((data[valid_size - 1] == 0xff) && valid_size > 0)
+		valid_size--;
+
+	return valid_size;
+}
+
 static int rmi_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
 		struct hid_report *report, u8 *data, int size)
 {
+	size = rmi_check_sanity(hdev, data, size);
+	if (size < 2)
+		return 0;
+
 	switch (data[0]) {
 	case RMI_READ_DATA_REPORT_ID:
 		return rmi_read_data_event(hdev, data, size);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/