linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/page_alloc: move migratetype recheck logic to __free_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141028073745.GD27813@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:37:45 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
	t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/page_alloc: move migratetype recheck logic to
 __free_one_page()

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > All the caller of __free_one_page() has similar migratetype recheck logic,
> > so we can move it to __free_one_page(). This reduce line of code and help
> > future maintenance. This is also preparation step for "mm/page_alloc:
> > restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock" which fix the
> > freepage accouting problem on freepage with more than pageblock order.
> > 
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> > ---
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |   24 ++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 5d2f807..433f92c 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -579,7 +579,15 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
> >  			return;
> >  
> >  	VM_BUG_ON(migratetype == -1);
> > +	if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone) ||
> > +		is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))) {
> 
> Since the v4 change of patch 1, this now adds
> is_migrate_isolate(migratetype) also for the free_pcppages_bulk path,
> where it's not needed?

Yes, you are right. But, patch 4 needs is_migrate_isolate() check
in __free_one_page().

> 
> > +		migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> > +		if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
> > +			goto skip_counting;
> > +	}
> > +	__mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
> >  
> > +skip_counting:
> >  	page_idx = pfn & ((1 << MAX_ORDER) - 1);
> >  
> >  	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_idx & ((1 << order) - 1), page);
> > @@ -725,14 +733,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
> >  			/* must delete as __free_one_page list manipulates */
> >  			list_del(&page->lru);
> >  			mt = get_freepage_migratetype(page);
> > -			if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
> > -				mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> > -				if (is_migrate_isolate(mt))
> > -					goto skip_counting;
> > -			}
> > -			__mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1, mt);
> >  
> > -skip_counting:
> >  			/* MIGRATE_MOVABLE list may include MIGRATE_RESERVEs */
> >  			__free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, 0, mt);
> >  			trace_mm_page_pcpu_drain(page, 0, mt);
> 
> The 'mt' here for the tracepoint is now different. I know it's the same
> as before patch 2, but the value introduced by patch 2 is more correct
> than the reverting to pre-patch 2 done here.

Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that.

> This and the introduced check above are maybe minor things, but it makes
> me question the value of unifying the check when the conditions in the
> two call paths are not completely the same...
> 
> I understand this is also prerequisity for patch 4 in some sense, but if
> you are reworking it anyway, then maybe this won't be needed in the end?

As mentioned above, is_migrate_isolate() check is needed in __free_one_page()
in any case. Reworked patch also needs this.

Hmm... I'd like to check isolate migratetype in just one place, but, it
seems to be impossible. To correct tracepoint, I will remain the check
in each functions. :/

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/