[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFiDJ5-WPfyS8Zn+NRu4ps3LKbt9xhhe=3sO1ykOjhrqEZx3rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:36:41 +0800
From: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/29] nios2: Time keeping
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>> No problem, I can change that. But, seem that we don't need to have
>> calibrate_delay_is_known() as well. We can just set "lpj_fine" variable,
>> arm64 uses this.
>
> Right, that works too.
Okay.
>
>> BTW, do you have further comment for other patches in this series? Only
>> few minor updates since v4 patches and would like to get it into the
>> v3.18 merge window if possible. What's your opinion?
>
> The 3.18 merge window is closed, we already have 3.18-rc2 now.
>
> I have taken another look over the series now, I only had
> a few additional comments. Please fix those along with the comments
> you got from other reviewers and then ask Stephen Rothwell to
> include your tree in linux-next (if it isn't already).
Okay, I will fix them and will ask Stephen to include nios2 tree later.
Anyone other thing I need to do other than this? Do we need setup
nios2 repo in git://git.kernel.org? Or can we use our own git repo?
>
> When 3.18 is released, you can then send a pull request to Linus.
Okay, will wait for 3.18 to release then.
Thanks for reviewing.
Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists