[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029085652.GK1304@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:56:52 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnurou@...il.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: gpio: guidelines for bindings
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:13:14PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Now that ACPI supports named GPIO properties, either through ACPI 5.1 or
> the per-driver ACPI GPIO mappings, we can be more narrow about the way
> GPIOs should be specified in Device Tree bindings.
>
> This patch updates the GPIO DT bindings documentation to highlight the
> following rules for new GPIO bindings:
>
> - All new bindings must have a meaningful name (e.g. the "gpios"
> property must not be used)
> - The only suffix allowed is "-gpios", no matter the number of
> descriptors in the property
> - GPIOs can only be grouped under the same property when they serve the
> same purpose, a case that should remain exceptional (e.g. bit-banged
> data lines).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists