[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029090732.GF3538@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:07:32 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] perf tools: Add a thread stack for synthesizing
call chains
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:45:12PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
SNIP
> };
>
> +enum {
> + PERF_FLAG_BRANCH = 1ULL << 0,
> + PERF_FLAG_CALL = 1ULL << 1,
> + PERF_FLAG_RETURN = 1ULL << 2,
> + PERF_FLAG_CONDITIONAL = 1ULL << 3,
> + PERF_FLAG_SYSCALLRET = 1ULL << 4,
> + PERF_FLAG_ASYNC = 1ULL << 5,
> + PERF_FLAG_INTERRUPT = 1ULL << 6,
> + PERF_FLAG_TX_ABORT = 1ULL << 7,
> + PERF_FLAG_TRACE_BEGIN = 1ULL << 8,
> + PERF_FLAG_TRACE_END = 1ULL << 9,
> + PERF_FLAG_IN_TX = 1ULL << 10,
> +};
> +
> +#define PERF_BRANCH_MASK (\
> + PERF_FLAG_BRANCH |\
> + PERF_FLAG_CALL |\
> + PERF_FLAG_RETURN |\
> + PERF_FLAG_CONDITIONAL |\
> + PERF_FLAG_SYSCALLRET |\
> + PERF_FLAG_ASYNC |\
> + PERF_FLAG_INTERRUPT |\
> + PERF_FLAG_TX_ABORT |\
> + PERF_FLAG_TRACE_BEGIN |\
> + PERF_FLAG_TRACE_END)
PERF_FLAG_ prefix seems too generic,
should it be something like PERF_BRANCH_FLAG__* ?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists