| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr30M3kR9rC8RFYwc2MZDDgV3o9LPta4WT4uiSemrd4Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:06:23 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: add pm runtime support
On 29 October 2014 03:15, Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com> wrote:
Hi Wenyou,
Could you please provide some more information in the commit message.
> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> index 0b9ddf8..e9d32d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/atmel-mci.h>
> #include <linux/atmel_pdc.h>
> +#include <linux/pm.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> @@ -44,6 +46,8 @@
>
> #include "atmel-mci-regs.h"
>
> +#define AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 50
> +
> #define ATMCI_DATA_ERROR_FLAGS (ATMCI_DCRCE | ATMCI_DTOE | ATMCI_OVRE | ATMCI_UNRE)
> #define ATMCI_DMA_THRESHOLD 16
>
> @@ -386,20 +390,19 @@ static int atmci_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> if (!buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&host->pdev->dev);
> +
> /*
> * Grab a more or less consistent snapshot. Note that we're
> * not disabling interrupts, so IMR and SR may not be
> * consistent.
> */
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> -
> spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
> memcpy_fromio(buf, host->regs, ATMCI_REGS_SIZE);
> spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
>
> - clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&host->pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&host->pdev->dev);
>
> seq_printf(s, "MR:\t0x%08x%s%s ",
> buf[ATMCI_MR / 4],
> @@ -449,7 +452,6 @@ static int atmci_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> val & ATMCI_CFG_LSYNC ? " LSYNC" : "");
> }
>
> -out:
> kfree(buf);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1252,6 +1254,8 @@ static void atmci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> WARN_ON(slot->mrq);
> dev_dbg(&host->pdev->dev, "MRQ: cmd %u\n", mrq->cmd->opcode);
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&host->pdev->dev);
> +
> /*
> * We may "know" the card is gone even though there's still an
> * electrical connection. If so, we really need to communicate
> @@ -1281,7 +1285,8 @@ static void atmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> struct atmel_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> struct atmel_mci *host = slot->host;
> unsigned int i;
> - bool unprepare_clk;
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&host->pdev->dev);
>
> slot->sdc_reg &= ~ATMCI_SDCBUS_MASK;
> switch (ios->bus_width) {
> @@ -1297,13 +1302,8 @@ static void atmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> unsigned int clock_min = ~0U;
> u32 clkdiv;
>
> - clk_prepare(host->mck);
> - unprepare_clk = true;
> -
> spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
> if (!host->mode_reg) {
> - clk_enable(host->mck);
> - unprepare_clk = false;
> atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_SWRST);
> atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_MCIEN);
> if (host->caps.has_cfg_reg)
> @@ -1371,8 +1371,6 @@ static void atmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> } else {
> bool any_slot_active = false;
>
> - unprepare_clk = false;
> -
> spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
> slot->clock = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < ATMCI_MAX_NR_SLOTS; i++) {
> @@ -1385,17 +1383,12 @@ static void atmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_MCIDIS);
> if (host->mode_reg) {
> atmci_readl(host, ATMCI_MR);
> - clk_disable(host->mck);
> - unprepare_clk = true;
> }
> host->mode_reg = 0;
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
> }
>
> - if (unprepare_clk)
> - clk_unprepare(host->mck);
> -
> switch (ios->power_mode) {
> case MMC_POWER_OFF:
> if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc))
> @@ -1421,6 +1414,9 @@ static void atmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> */
> break;
> }
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&host->pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&host->pdev->dev);
> }
>
> static int atmci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> @@ -1512,6 +1508,9 @@ static void atmci_request_end(struct atmel_mci *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> mmc_request_done(prev_mmc, mrq);
> spin_lock(&host->lock);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&host->pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&host->pdev->dev);
> }
>
> static void atmci_command_complete(struct atmel_mci *host,
> @@ -2417,7 +2416,6 @@ static int __init atmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_SWRST);
> host->bus_hz = clk_get_rate(host->mck);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
>
> host->mapbase = regs->start;
>
> @@ -2449,6 +2447,12 @@ static int __init atmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> setup_timer(&host->timer, atmci_timeout_timer, (unsigned long)host);
>
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY);
> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
The above is wrong. You will get clock unbalance issues, meaning that
the clock will never be gated at runtime PM suspend.
Fix it by change the hole chunk of code above to:
pm_runtime_get_noresume();
pm_runtime_set_active();
pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay();
pm_runtime_use_autosuspend();
pm_runtime_enable();
> + pm_suspend_ignore_children(&pdev->dev, 1);
Is this needed?
> +
> /* We need at least one slot to succeed */
> nr_slots = 0;
> ret = -ENODEV;
> @@ -2491,6 +2495,9 @@ static int __init atmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "Atmel MCI controller at 0x%08lx irq %d, %u slots\n",
> host->mapbase, irq, nr_slots);
>
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&host->pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> +
> return 0;
>
> err_dma_alloc:
> @@ -2499,6 +2506,9 @@ err_dma_alloc:
> atmci_cleanup_slot(host->slot[i], i);
> }
> err_init_slot:
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
According to upper comment, you must switch order, and you should use
pm_runtime_put_noidle() instead.
Moreover you needs to have a clk_disable_uprepare() in the error
handling and prior the above.
> +
> del_timer_sync(&host->timer);
> if (host->dma.chan)
> dma_release_channel(host->dma.chan);
> @@ -2511,6 +2521,8 @@ static int __exit atmci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct atmel_mci *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> unsigned int i;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> +
> if (host->buffer)
> dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, host->buf_size,
> host->buffer, host->buf_phys_addr);
> @@ -2520,11 +2532,9 @@ static int __exit atmci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> atmci_cleanup_slot(host->slot[i], i);
> }
>
> - clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
> atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_IDR, ~0UL);
> atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_MCIDIS);
> atmci_readl(host, ATMCI_SR);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
>
> del_timer_sync(&host->timer);
> if (host->dma.chan)
> @@ -2532,14 +2542,76 @@ static int __exit atmci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), host);
>
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
Same comment as for fixing the error handling in ->probe().
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int atmci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct atmel_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int atmci_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct atmel_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int atmci_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct atmel_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int atmci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct atmel_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + return clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops atmci_dev_pm_ops = {
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(atmci_suspend, atmci_resume)
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(atmci_runtime_suspend, atmci_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
I would suggest the following changes to simplify code and to improve
runtime PM support a bit.
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(atmci_runtime_suspend, atmci_runtime_resume, NULL)
Do note the change from SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS -> SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS.
That means you will be able to remove atmci_suspend|resume() functions entirely.
> +
> +#define ATMCI_PM_OPS (&atmci_dev_pm_ops)
> +#else
> +#define ATMCI_PM_OPS NULL
> +#endif
This is micro optimization, not needed. Just use the atmci_dev_pm_ops
directly below instead.
> +
> static struct platform_driver atmci_driver = {
> .remove = __exit_p(atmci_remove),
> .driver = {
> .name = "atmel_mci",
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(atmci_dt_ids),
> + .pm = ATMCI_PM_OPS,
> },
> };
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists