linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] regulator: max77686: Add suspend disable for some LDOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141029103140.GY18557@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:31:40 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] regulator: max77686: Add suspend disable for some
 LDOs

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:18:54AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On śro, 2014-10-29 at 10:01 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > No, this isn't suspend enable control - this is normal, standard enable
> > control and the device has no suspend enable control.

> You mean that for such regulator the driver shouldn't implement
> suspend_enable()?

Yes, if there is no separate control of suspend mode in hardware then of
course the driver shouldn't implement operations for things it doesn't
have.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)