[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5450C915.9030600@imgtec.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:01:41 +0000
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] of: Add binding document for MIPS GIC
On 10/29/2014 12:12 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> +- mti,available-cpu-vectors : Specifies the list of CPU interrupt vectors
> + to which the GIC may route interrupts. May contain up to 6 entries, one
> + for each of the CPU's hardware interrupt vectors. Valid values are 2 - 7.
> + This property is ignored if the CPU is started in EIC mode.
> +
Wouldn't it be better to have this in the reversed sense ie:
mti,nonavailable-cpu-vectors? I think the assumption that by default
they're all available unless something else is connected to them which
is unlikely in most cases. It can be made optional property then.
I don't have a strong opinion about it though.
Qais
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists