[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029125005.GB8823@localhost>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:05 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, nsekhar@...com,
t-kristo@...com, j-keerthy@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: omap: add support for pmic_power_en
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:40:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:09:28 +0100 Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> But in general, how do you want to handle updates to a single patch in a
> series you already have in your tree? Do you prefer a proper
> incremental-fix patch (with commit message), just an updated single
> patch, or a resend of the whole series?
How should I best send the updated patch? Can you just replace the
current three incremental patches:
rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en.patch
rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en-v3.patch
rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en-v3-fix.patch
that you have in your tree, with a single new v4 which adds a more
elaborate comment?
Thanks,
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists