lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 03:04:48 +0000 From: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com> To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> CC: "Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/3] firmware loader: Introduce new API - request_firmware_abort() > -----Original Message----- > From: Ming Lei [mailto:ming.lei@...onical.com] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:00 AM > > You can call fw_lookup_buf() directly, otherwise feel free to add: > > Acked-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> > Hi Ming Lei, The fw_lookup_buf() is defined inside the conditional preprocessor directive for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. Since the request_firmware_abort() may not only be used in PM_SLEEP, could I move the fw_lookup_buf() out from the CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block if we want to call fw_lookup_buf() instead of __fw_lookup_buf()? Thanks. Regards, Wilson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists