[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029083610.GA9261@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:36:10 +0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Junien Fridrick <linux.kernel@...ien.fridrick.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org, Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@...el.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Isaac Huang <he.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static
declarations
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:09:34PM +0000, Junien Fridrick wrote:
> This patch fixes the following sparse warnings :
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routes' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:293:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_peers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:660:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_nis' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Junien Fridrick <linux.kernel@...ien.fridrick.net>
> ---
> This patch is part of task 16 of the Eudyptula challenge
> Applies to next-20141023
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This patch fails to apply to my tree, please refresh and try again.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists