lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:50:55 +0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sgrubb@...hat.com, pmoore@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][STABLE] audit: correct AUDIT_GET_FEATURE return message
 type

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:35:06AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> When an AUDIT_GET_FEATURE message is sent from userspace to the kernel, it
> should reply with a message tagged as an AUDIT_GET_FEATURE type with a struct
> audit_feature.  The current reply is a message tagged as an AUDIT_GET
> type with a struct audit_feature.
> 
> This appears to have been a cut-and-paste-eo in commit b0fed40.
> 
> Reported-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v3.13-rc1
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/audit.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Why did you send this directly to stable@...r?  That's not how to get a
patch into the stable kernel trees...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ