[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1414598634-13446-4-git-send-email-andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:03:54 +0400
From: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Cc: ismael.luceno@...p.bluecherry.net, m.chehab@...sung.com,
hverkuil@...all.nl, Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] [media] solo6x10: don't turn off/on encoder interrupt in processing loop
The used approach actually cannot prevent new encoder interrupt to
appear, because interrupt handler can execute in different thread, and
in current implementation there is still race condition regarding this.
Also from practice the code with this change seems to work as stable as
before.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@...il.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c b/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c
index b9b61b9..30e09d9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/solo6x10/solo6x10-v4l2-enc.c
@@ -703,9 +703,7 @@ static int solo_ring_thread(void *data)
if (timeout == -ERESTARTSYS || kthread_should_stop())
break;
- solo_irq_off(solo_dev, SOLO_IRQ_ENCODER);
solo_handle_ring(solo_dev);
- solo_irq_on(solo_dev, SOLO_IRQ_ENCODER);
try_to_freeze();
}
--
1.8.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists