[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaHEE43n6V-y6XECicPaoEAfTBpyfg8bYJZK0e-pSMAJjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:08:10 -0700
From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] of: Add binding document for MIPS GIC
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 12:12 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>
>> +- reg : Base address and length of the GIC registers.
>>
>
> Also except for sead3, the base address should be properly reported by the
> hardware. The size is fixed (for a specific version of GIC at least - which
> is also reported by the hardware). So it would be nice to make this
> optional.
Even though this is usually probable, I'd prefer to leave this as
required, or at least "optional, but recommended". I don't have a
very strong opinion on it though, but perhaps the device-tree folks
do?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists