linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/11] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Use irq_reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1414555138-6500-7-git-send-email-cernekee@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:58:54 -0700
From:	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
To:	f.fainelli@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	mbizon@...ebox.fr, jogo@...nwrt.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Use irq_reg_* accessors

This change was just made on bcm7120-l2, so let's keep things consistent
between the two drivers.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
index c9bdf20..8b82b86 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 
 	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
-	status = __raw_readl(b->base + CPU_STATUS) &
-		~(__raw_readl(b->base + CPU_MASK_STATUS));
+	status = irq_reg_readl(b->base + CPU_STATUS) &
+		~(irq_reg_readl(b->base + CPU_MASK_STATUS));
 
 	if (status == 0) {
 		raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 	do {
 		irq = ffs(status) - 1;
 		/* ack at our level */
-		__raw_writel(1 << irq, b->base + CPU_CLEAR);
+		irq_reg_writel(1 << irq, b->base + CPU_CLEAR);
 		status &= ~(1 << irq);
 		generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(b->domain, irq));
 	} while (status);
@@ -86,12 +86,12 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_suspend(struct irq_data *d)
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
 	/* Save the current mask */
-	b->saved_mask = __raw_readl(b->base + CPU_MASK_STATUS);
+	b->saved_mask = irq_reg_readl(b->base + CPU_MASK_STATUS);
 
 	if (b->can_wake) {
 		/* Program the wakeup mask */
-		__raw_writel(~gc->wake_active, b->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
-		__raw_writel(gc->wake_active, b->base + CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
+		irq_reg_writel(~gc->wake_active, b->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
+		irq_reg_writel(gc->wake_active, b->base + CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
 	}
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 }
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_resume(struct irq_data *d)
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
 	/* Clear unmasked non-wakeup interrupts */
-	__raw_writel(~b->saved_mask & ~gc->wake_active, b->base + CPU_CLEAR);
+	irq_reg_writel(~b->saved_mask & ~gc->wake_active, b->base + CPU_CLEAR);
 
 	/* Restore the saved mask */
-	__raw_writel(b->saved_mask, b->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
-	__raw_writel(~b->saved_mask, b->base + CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
+	irq_reg_writel(b->saved_mask, b->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
+	irq_reg_writel(~b->saved_mask, b->base + CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 }
 
@@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
 	}
 
 	/* Disable all interrupts by default */
-	__raw_writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
-	__raw_writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_CLEAR);
+	irq_reg_writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
+	irq_reg_writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_CLEAR);
 
 	data->parent_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
 	if (data->parent_irq < 0) {
-- 
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/