[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029192141.GB16312@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:21:42 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Burke Libbey <burke.libbey@...pify.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix race between task_group and sched_task_group
On 10/29, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> On 29.10.2014 01:52, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > And cgroup_task_migrate() can free ->cgroups via call_rcu(). Of course,
> > in practice raw_spin_lock_irq() should also act as rcu_read_lock(), but
> > we should not rely on implementation details.
>
> Do you mean cgroup_task_migrate()->put_css_set_locked()? It's not
> possible there, because old_cset->refcount is lager than 1. We increment
> it in cgroup_migrate_add_src() and real freeing happens in
> cgroup_migrate_finish(). These functions are around task_migrate(), they
> are pair brackets.
Ah, I see.
> If we've got old_cset in
> cgroup_post_fork()->sched_move_task(), the right sched_task_group will
> be installed by attach->sched_move_task().
Yes, yes, this part is clear.
OK, I think the patch is fine then.
Thanks!
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists