linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54520A21.20404@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:51:29 +0100
From:	Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation

On 2014-10-30 00:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> There is a 1815 line documentation file in this series, so we aren't
> trying to not provide this type of information here at all.  But yes,
> more background, about why this can't be done in userspace (zero copy,
> less context switches, proper credential passing, timestamping, availble
> at early-boot, LSM hooks for security models to tie into

While you're at it... I have worked on proof-of-concept LSM patches for
kdbus some time ago, see [1][2].  Currently, these are completely of date.

 [1] https://github.com/lmctl/linux/commits/kdbus-lsm-v4.for-systemd-v212
 [2] https://github.com/lmctl/kdbus/commit/aa0885489d19be92fa41c6f0a71df28763228a40

May I ask if you guys have your own plan for LSM or maybe it would be
worth to resurrect [1]?

Cheers,
-- 
Karol Lewandowski, Samsung R&D Institute Poland


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/