[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141030101808.GO27405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:18:08 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/syscalls: ignore numbers outside NR_syscalls'
range
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:26:06AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:06:58PM +0100, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > ARM has some private syscalls (for example, set_tls(2)) which lie
> > outside the range of NR_syscalls. If any of these are called while
> > syscall tracing is being performed, out-of-bounds array access will
> > occur in the ftrace and perf sys_{enter,exit} handlers.
>
> While this patch looks like good caution, having syscalls outside of
> NR_syscalls seems like a receipe for a disaster. Can you try to fix
> that issue as ell, please?
No. We've had them since the inception of Linux on ARM. They predate
this tracing crap by more than a decade. We're not changing them
because that would be a massive user API breakage.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists