[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54521324.8070007@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:29:56 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"juri.lelli@...il.com" <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched/dl: don't check CONFIG_SMP in switched_from_dl
Hi,
On 27/10/14 01:41, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> There are both UP and SMP version of pull_dl_task(), so don't need
> to check CONFIG_SMP in switched_from_dl();
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 21de865..35d6dd5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1577,7 +1577,6 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> __dl_clear_params(p);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> * Since this might be the only -deadline task on the rq,
> * this is the right place to try to pull some other one
> @@ -1585,7 +1584,6 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> */
> if (!rq->dl.dl_nr_running && pull_dl_task(rq))
> resched_curr(rq);
> -#endif
> }
>
> /*
>
Yes, we can remove it.
Thanks,
- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists