[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141030073028.284c468c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:30:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/syscalls: ignore numbers outside NR_syscalls'
range
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:14:41 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> We have always had syscall number range of 0x900000 or so. The tracing
> design does not expect that. Therefore, the tracing design did not take
> account of ARM when it was created. Therefore, it's up to the tracing
> people to decide how to properly fit their ill-designed subsystem into
> one of the popular and well-established kernel architectures - or at
> least suggest a way to work around this issue.
>
Fine, lets define a MAX_SYSCALL_NR that is by default NR_syscalls, but
an architecture can override it.
In trace_syscalls.c, where the checks are done, have this:
#ifndef MAX_SYSCALL_NR
# define MAX_SYSCALL_NR NR_syscalls
#endif
change all the checks to test against MAX_SYSCALL_NR instead of
NR_syscalls.
Then in arch/arm/include/asm/syscall.h have:
#define MAX_SYSCALL_NR 0xa00000
or whatever would be the highest syscall number for ARM.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists