lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:04:13 -0200
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
To:	Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
Cc:	archit@...com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, hans.verkuil@...co.com,
	k.debski@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media, platform,
 LLVMLinux: Remove nested function from ti-vpe

Em Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:11:45 -0700
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com> escreveu:

> Replace the use of nested functions where a normal function will suffice.
> 
> Nested functions are not liked by upstream kernel developers in general. Their
> use breaks the use of clang as a compiler, and doesn't make the code any
> better.
> 
> This code now works for both gcc and clang.

I'm ok with this patch, as it makes the code cleaner, but in a few
cases, such functions could be useful, for example for doing things
like typecasting or when we need to use multiple versions of the same
code, one to be used internally and another to be used externally
with a different set of arguments inside the function call
(none of this applies here, it seems).

So, I think clang should be fixed anyway to support it.

Anyway, I'll be applying this patch.

Regards,
Mauro

> 
> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/csc.c | 8 ++------
>  drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c  | 8 ++------
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/csc.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/csc.c
> index 940df40..44fbf41 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/csc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/csc.c
> @@ -93,12 +93,8 @@ void csc_dump_regs(struct csc_data *csc)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &csc->pdev->dev;
>  
> -	u32 read_reg(struct csc_data *csc, int offset)
> -	{
> -		return ioread32(csc->base + offset);
> -	}
> -
> -#define DUMPREG(r) dev_dbg(dev, "%-35s %08x\n", #r, read_reg(csc, CSC_##r))
> +#define DUMPREG(r) dev_dbg(dev, "%-35s %08x\n", #r, \
> +	ioread32(csc->base + CSC_##r))
>  
>  	DUMPREG(CSC00);
>  	DUMPREG(CSC01);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c
> index 6314171..1088381 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c
> @@ -24,12 +24,8 @@ void sc_dump_regs(struct sc_data *sc)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &sc->pdev->dev;
>  
> -	u32 read_reg(struct sc_data *sc, int offset)
> -	{
> -		return ioread32(sc->base + offset);
> -	}
> -
> -#define DUMPREG(r) dev_dbg(dev, "%-35s %08x\n", #r, read_reg(sc, CFG_##r))
> +#define DUMPREG(r) dev_dbg(dev, "%-35s %08x\n", #r, \
> +	ioread32(sc->base + CFG_##r))
>  
>  	DUMPREG(SC0);
>  	DUMPREG(SC1);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists