linux-kernel - Re: [for-next][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add dynamic trampoline support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141030125650.2427061e@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:56:50 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add dynamic trampoline support

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:27:30 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > This adds the allocation of dynamic trampolines. It still does not
> > allow for dynamic ftrace_ops to use them on CONFIG_PREEMPT systems.
> > That will come in 3.20, as I want to test out call_rcu_tasks() for
> > a bit first on my own boxes.
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
> > for-next
> > 
> > Head SHA1: 9fd7caf67913fbf35d834beaa8f9764d733a9236
> > 
> > 
> > Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (4):
> >       ftrace/x86: Add dynamic allocated trampoline for ftrace_ops
> >       ftrace/x86: Show trampoline call function in enabled_functions
> >       ftrace/x86: Allow !CONFIG_PREEMPT dynamic ops to use allocated trampolines
> >       ftrace: Add more information to ftrace_bug() output
> 
> FWIW I just did a very quick test, and kGraft seems to run flawlessly on 
> top of this.
> 

Does that mean I can add your Tested-by: for all these patches?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/