lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141029202045.1988662c@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:20:45 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFA][PATCH 1/8] seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
 seq_has_overflowed() and make public

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:08:36 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 17:56 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +A true return from seq_has_overflowed means that the seq_file buffer is full
> > +and further output will be discarded.
> 
> Perhaps the description is a bit unclear here.
> 
> Doesn't a return of true to seq_has_overflowed mean that
> more characters have already been written than the buffer
> can accept?
> 

Actually, come to think about it. It really doesn't matter. As if it is
"full" or overflowed, the buffer currently gets discarded regardless.
Thus, it could mean that the buffer was already overflowed. Because the
current logic is full == overflowed. Really, a full buffer is a buffer
with all but one byte left used. If size == len, then it has indeed
overflowed.

That is what my other patch changes.

I'll change the comment about that.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ