linux-kernel - [RFD] perf syscall error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:28:14 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFD] perf syscall error handling

Hi,

Earlier today I was reminded that perf syscall error handling sucks arse
-- albeit not in those words.

Now I know we've had this discussion before, but nothing really
happened. I think back then the suggestion was having the kernel write a
string back or somesuch.

The problem with a string is, its hard for machines to interpret, its
English, so near impossible for some humans too.

So would something simple, like an offset into the struct
perf_event_attr pointing at the current field we're trying to process
make sense? Maybe with negative offsets to indicate the syscall
arguments?

That would narrow down the 'WTF is wrong noaw' a lot I think. But then,
I've not actually done a lot of userspace the last few years, so maybe
I'm just dreaming things.

Anybody?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/