[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141030232526.46cd545f@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:25:26 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A desktop environment[1] kernel wishlist
O> The kernel receives an interrupt, likely on a different device. Again,
> I'm talking about "legacy" devices, for which suspend is actually a
> state. If the device is only in low-power mode, you'd probably get the
> event on the input device, which is accessible from user-space.
I don't believe so - the firmware ate it.
> Knowing why the Wi-Fi card woke up is also important when there isn't a
> full "suspend" state. As was mentioned, it's useful for power debugging,
> but it's also useful because that tells things outside the network card
> driver what happened.
Wifi devices that are smart generally have a fair bit of info they
provide themselves on this. In particular if you are using a deep idle
type behaviour they may well wake every minute or so just to poke a
packet out to keep any NAT mapping alive.
> As I mentioned in more recent emails on this thread, maybe we don't want
> to know what woke the system up, but knowing that a wake-up event
> occurred on this device, at this time, would allow us to make the
> software act accordingly. The fact that we don't know that means that we
> cannot take appropriate action.
What woke the system up may also not be a singular item. Suppose the
alarm goes off as the user opens the lid and the wireless gets a wakeup
packet in the same window ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists