[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141031012954.GA20367@hr-slim.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:29:55 +0800
From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Jason Chang <jason.chang@....com>,
Vincent Wan <vincent.wan@....com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/20] usb: dwc3: add Tx de-emphasis quirk
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:42:10AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:08:39PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > This patch adds Tx de-emphasis quirk, and the Tx de-emphasis value is
> > configurable according to PIPE3 specification.
> >
> > Value Description
> > 0 -6dB de-emphasis
> > 1 -3.5dB de-emphasis
> > 2 No de-emphasis
> > 3 Reserved
> >
> > It can be configured on DT or platform data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
>
> doesn't apply:
>
> checking file Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
> checking file drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 718 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 777 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 807 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 829 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 840 (offset -2 lines).
> checking file drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 697.
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
> checking file drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h
>
> please rebase on testing/next
>
That's because in patch 12 and other ones you applied, I changed
addreviations to uppercase such as "lfps" -> "LFPS", "fpga" -> "FPGA".
Previous 13 patches are already applied. Do you mean, I send the other
patches since "Tx de-emphasis" (patch 14) after rebased current
branch.
If yes, at patch 1, "Enabling this bit ... hibernation .. yet", should
it be updated in extra patch?
Thanks,
Rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists