[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141031015843.GW9743@dangermouse.emea.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:58:43 +0000
From: Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, jbaron@...mai.com,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel, add panic_on_warn
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 17:06 Prarit Bhargava wrote:
| There have been several times where I have had to rebuild a kernel to
| cause a panic when hitting a WARN() in the code in order to get a crash
| dump from a system. Sometimes this is easy to do, other times (such as
| in the case of a remote admin) it is not trivial to send new images to the
| user.
|
| A much easier method would be a switch to change the WARN() over to a
| panic. This makes debugging easier in that I can now test the actual
| image the WARN() was seen on and I do not have to engage in remote
| debugging.
Do we want to leave it to usersspace[1] to ensure panic_on_warn is out
of the way in when the kdump kernel boots? or would a self-contained
approach be more preferable i.e. test whether we're a kdump kernel
before bothering with panic_on_warn?
Cheers,
Hedi.
[1] kexec-tools in the case of the boot param by filtering it out of the
kdump kernel cmdline. In the case of sysctl.conf, it would depend on
whether there are distros out there that include it in the kdump
initrd.
--
Hedi Berriche
Linux Kernel Engineer
http://www.sgi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists