[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXdPV5+qJ438Ky=tfBiEmqeeTYNuukQS7TcjbEwDgzwGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:44:43 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Rannaud <e@...ocritical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: allow open(dir, O_TMPFILE|..., 0) with mode 0
On Oct 31, 2014 1:42 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:01:30PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > flink()), the mode really matters. So this idiotic glibc behavior of
> > > only forwarding the third argument if O_CREAT is set seems to be a
> > > bug.
> >
> > We could bite the bullet and add a tmpfile syscall. /me ducks
>
> I've got another use case for that: Samba. It wants to inherit
> all kinds of attributes (xattrs, modes, etc) during file creation,
> and right now it's doing it in a racy way. I've come up with a patch
> to use O_TEMPFILE + flink, but it turns out that Samba may as well
> be asked to create read-only files, which we can't create using
> O_TMPFILE.
Does the patch in this thread not fix that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists