| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:36:14 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
will.deacon@....com, tech@...tualopensystems.com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, eric.auger@...aro.org,
kim.phillips@...escale.com, marc.zyngier@....com,
"open list:VFIO DRIVER" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/19] vfio/platform: trigger an interrupt via eventfd
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 19:07 +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> This patch allows to set an eventfd for a patform device's interrupt,
> and also to trigger the interrupt eventfd from userspace for testing.
> Level sensitive interrupts are marked as maskable and are handled in
> a later patch. Edge triggered interrupts are not advertised as maskable
> and are implemented here using a simple and efficient IRQ handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> index 007b386..2ac8ed7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> @@ -45,11 +45,91 @@ static int vfio_platform_set_irq_unmask(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static irqreturn_t vfio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct vfio_platform_irq *irq_ctx = dev_id;
> +
> + eventfd_signal(irq_ctx->trigger, 1);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,
> + int fd, irq_handler_t handler)
> +{
> + struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = &vdev->irqs[index];
> + struct eventfd_ctx *trigger;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (irq->trigger) {
> + free_irq(irq->hwirq, irq);
> + kfree(irq->name);
> + eventfd_ctx_put(irq->trigger);
> + irq->trigger = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (fd < 0) /* Disable only */
> + return 0;
> +
> + irq->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio-irq[%d](%s)",
> + irq->hwirq, vdev->name);
> + if (!irq->name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + trigger = eventfd_ctx_fdget(fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(trigger)) {
> + kfree(irq->name);
> + return PTR_ERR(trigger);
> + }
> +
> + irq->trigger = trigger;
> +
> + ret = request_irq(irq->hwirq, handler, 0, irq->name, irq);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(irq->name);
> + eventfd_ctx_put(trigger);
> + irq->trigger = NULL;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_platform_set_irq_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> unsigned index, unsigned start,
> unsigned count, uint32_t flags, void *data)
> {
> - return -EINVAL;
> + struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = &vdev->irqs[index];
> + irq_handler_t handler;
> +
> + if (vdev->irqs[index].flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_MASKABLE)
> + return -EINVAL; /* not implemented */
> + else
> + handler = vfio_irq_handler;
> +
> + if (!count && (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE))
> + return vfio_set_trigger(vdev, index, -1, handler);
> +
> + if (start != 0 || count != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
> + int32_t fd = *(int32_t *)data;
> +
> + return vfio_set_trigger(vdev, index, fd, handler);
> + }
> +
> + if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
> + handler(irq->hwirq, irq);
> +
> + } else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) {
> + uint8_t trigger = *(uint8_t *)data;
> +
> + if (trigger)
> + handler(irq->hwirq, irq);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int vfio_platform_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> @@ -95,7 +175,11 @@ int vfio_platform_irq_init(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> if (hwirq < 0)
> goto err;
>
> - vdev->irqs[i].flags = 0;
> + vdev->irqs[i].flags = VFIO_IRQ_INFO_EVENTFD;
> +
> + if (irq_get_trigger_type(hwirq) & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
> + vdev->irqs[i].flags |= VFIO_IRQ_INFO_MASKABLE;
This is a bit confusing because edge interrupts can support masking, but
they don't require it. Level interrupts really must support masking
because we need to mask them on the host and therefore the user needs to
be able to unmask them (ignoring the irq prioritization thing you guys
can do on arm). So this works, but I would really have expected
VFIO_IRQ_INFO_AUTOMASKED here and in the above function.
> +
> vdev->irqs[i].count = 1;
> vdev->irqs[i].hwirq = hwirq;
> }
> @@ -110,6 +194,11 @@ err:
>
> void vfio_platform_irq_cleanup(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++)
> + vfio_set_trigger(vdev, i, -1, NULL);
> +
> vdev->num_irqs = 0;
> kfree(vdev->irqs);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> index ffa2459..a3f2411 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct vfio_platform_irq {
> u32 flags;
> u32 count;
> int hwirq;
> + char *name;
> + struct eventfd_ctx *trigger;
> };
>
> struct vfio_platform_region {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists