[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141101171909.GA5034@pd.tnic>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 18:19:09 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, cpu: trivial printk formatting fixes
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 03:44:56PM +0000, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> A 2 line printk makes dmesg output messy, because the second line does not get a timestamp.
> For example:
>
> [ 0.012863] CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM1)
> [ 0.012869] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 1024
> Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 1024, 1GB 4
> [ 0.012958] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 28K (ffffffff81d86000 - ffffffff81d8d000)
> [ 0.014961] dmar: Host address width 39
It looks just fine here, albeit with repeated timestamp:
$ dmesg | grep -E "[id]TLB"
[ 0.269607] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 1024, 4MB 512
[ 0.269607] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 512, 1GB 0
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists