lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 1 Nov 2014 18:36:25 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Benoit Masson <yahoo@...enite.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes

Sebastian,

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usual,
> I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-300d
> dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing
> lists instead of each of the DT maintainers.
> 
> First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one common
> node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and node
> alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are moved
> to the common node from one board specific node.
> 
> Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d which
> is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I also
> found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally,
> there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is set
> for two.
> 
> I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is nothing
> important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have
> already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do no
> harm.
> 
> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in
> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit
> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great.

I lost track of this thread, are you resending?  Did Benoit get a
successful test run?

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ