linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 002/102] percpu: fix pcpu_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1414880883.834348750@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 01 Nov 2014 22:28:03 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 002/102] percpu: fix pcpu_alloc_pages() failure path

3.2.64-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

commit f0d279654dea22b7a6ad34b9334aee80cda62cde upstream.

When pcpu_alloc_pages() fails midway, pcpu_free_pages() is invoked to
free what has already been allocated.  The invocation is across the
whole requested range and pcpu_free_pages() will try to free all
non-NULL pages; unfortunately, this is incorrect as
pcpu_get_pages_and_bitmap(), unlike what its comment suggests, doesn't
clear the pages array and thus the array may have entries from the
previous invocations making the partial failure path free incorrect
pages.

Fix it by open-coding the partial freeing of the already allocated
pages.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 mm/percpu-vm.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/percpu-vm.c
+++ b/mm/percpu-vm.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_pages(struct pcpu_
 			    int page_start, int page_end)
 {
 	const gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_COLD;
-	unsigned int cpu;
+	unsigned int cpu, tcpu;
 	int i;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -116,14 +116,23 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_pages(struct pcpu_
 			struct page **pagep = &pages[pcpu_page_idx(cpu, i)];
 
 			*pagep = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), gfp, 0);
-			if (!*pagep) {
-				pcpu_free_pages(chunk, pages, populated,
-						page_start, page_end);
-				return -ENOMEM;
-			}
+			if (!*pagep)
+				goto err;
 		}
 	}
 	return 0;
+
+err:
+	while (--i >= page_start)
+		__free_page(pages[pcpu_page_idx(cpu, i)]);
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(tcpu) {
+		if (tcpu == cpu)
+			break;
+		for (i = page_start; i < page_end; i++)
+			__free_page(pages[pcpu_page_idx(tcpu, i)]);
+	}
+	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 /**

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/