linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 1 Nov 2014 18:59:53 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Benoit Masson <benoitm@...enite.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Benoit Masson <yahoo@...enite.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 02:53:02AM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote:
> 
> Le 6 oct. 2014 à 18:13, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> a écrit :
> 
> > On 10/06/2014 01:11 AM, Benoit Masson wrote:
> >> Le 3 oct. 2014 à 17:41, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> a écrit :
> >>> On 10/03/2014 05:29 PM, Benoit Masson wrote:
> >>>> Le 3 oct. 2014 à 17:06, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> a écrit :
> >>>>> On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 19 sept. 2014 à 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> a écrit :
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>>>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in
> >>>>>>>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit
> >>>>>>>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch from the
> >>>>>>> series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'll be
> >>>>>>> able to test during next week.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Did you ever get a chance to test this series?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushed the
> >>>>> patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on
> >>>>> v3.17-rc1 to
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4
> >>>>> 
> >>> [...]
> >> Maybe I missed something ? is this branch you sent me a bare fork
> >> from mainline 3.17 ? does it includes the armada XP step A0 patch ?
> > 
> > Benoit,
> > 
> Hi,
> > I prepared more branches with the series
> > - on top of v3.17 release:
> > https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4_v3.17
> > 
> > - on top of next-20141003 (i.e. what will become v3.18-rc1):
> > https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4_next-20141003
> > 
> > It would be great, if you can test in this order:
> > - vanilla v3.17
> > - mvebu-ix4_v3.17
> > - mvebu-ix4_next-20141003
> > 
> All the 3 branch works WHEN APPLYING A0 patch (below), with both my
> custom kernel config and the arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v7_defconfig

Can I count this as a Tested-by?

> The reason why it didn't worked last time was that apparently the A0
> patch (copied) below was not merged into 3.17 :(

Yep, sorry.  Life got the best of me.  The pull request is now sent.

> This means that ix4-300d support is broken on 3.17 because of the A0
> stepping patch not merged.

Not a problem.  It's flagged for stable v3.12 and up.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/