[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54549DBA.5020102@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 09:45:46 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
carlos@...rcia.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, jkosina@...e.cz,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Document binding for regulator suspend
voltage
Hello Doug,
On 11/01/2014 04:52 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> This patch builds upon (291d761 regulator: Document binding for
> regulator suspend state for PM state) to allow setting the uV in
> addition to the state at suspend time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> index aaad615..4e7ed76 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ Optional properties:
> - regulator-state-[mem/disk] node has following common properties:
> - regulator-on-in-suspend: regulator should be on in suspend state.
> - regulator-off-in-suspend: regulator should be off in suspend state.
> + - regulator-suspend-microvolt: regulator should be set to this voltage
> + in suspend.
The patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
On thing I wonder is if the binding should say that the suspend voltage is
independent of the runtime one and it may be outside of the runtime range?
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists