lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141102.182430.2172669108987505623.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 02 Nov 2014 18:24:30 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	clemens@...isch.de
Cc:	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64: Add preprocessor symbols for PAGE_* pgprot_t
 values.

From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:15:12 +0100

> Kernel code assumes that the PAGE_* values are preprocessor symbols, and
> that therefore arch support can be checked for with #ifdef.
> 
> At the moment, sparc64 does not implement any of the symbols checked
> for, so these checks happen to work.
> 
> To prevent potential breakage when another #ifdef check is added or when
> sparc64 implements another PAGE_ value, make such #ifdef checks work by
> adding preprocessor symbols on top of the PAGE_* variables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>

"This change actually doesn't have any effect, and doesn't matter,
 so let's make this change."

I really don't buy this.

I'd also rather the kernel use Kconfig based symbols to detect for
arch availability of feature X or Y, assuming things are CPP symbols
is very fragile at best.

I'm not applying this, sorry.  I mean, you didn't even bother to
mention what symbol this does matter for.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ