[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141102111336.GD5229@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:13:37 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, cpu: trivial printk formatting fixes
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 04:03:52AM +0000, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> Hmm - the difference is to do with the source of the kernel ring
> buffer. The old output format be obtained using the latest dmesg by
> adding "-S", which uses syslog(2) rather than /dev/kmsg.
> (added in commit 7af230601ab)
>
> The klogctl version interprets the \n and adds the timestamp
> afterwards, but /dev/kmsg changes the '\n' to "\x0a" resulting in:
> 4,355,10557,-;ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was
> 'performance'\x0aENERGY_P...
>
> It looks as though it's just a matter of opinion/preference whether
> control characters are printed (rfc5424)
Right, I see what you mean. There's this in the /dev/kmsg code
---
* /dev/kmsg exports the structured data in the following line format:
* "level,sequnum,timestamp;<message text>\n"
*
* The optional key/value pairs are attached as continuation lines starting
* with a space character and terminated by a newline. All possible
* non-prinatable characters are escaped in the "\xff" notation.
*
* Users of the export format should ignore possible additional values
* separated by ',', and find the message after the ';' character.
*/
--
and also
---
/* escape non-printable characters */
for (i = 0; i < msg->text_len; i++) {
unsigned char c = log_text(msg)[i];
if (c < ' ' || c >= 127 || c == '\\')
len += sprintf(user->buf + len, "\\x%02x", c);
else
user->buf[len++] = c;
}
--
in devkmsg_read().
Hmm, so this all looks like an agreed upon thing or whatever. Oh, and
btw, if you don't enable printk timestamping, you won't see the issue.
I'd say the simplest solution - and this is only me and I like practical
- is to accept your patch after all and stop wasting time with this :-)
Only after you fix it, though, to *not* change log levels for the other
printk message. FWIW, your change even improves the readability a bit of
those printks.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists