linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:20:39 -0700
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	<hch@...radead.org>, <dedekind1@...il.com>
CC:	<dwmw2@...radead.org>, <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support

On 2014-11-02 15:49, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> AFAICT blk-mq allocates one struct ubiblock_pdu per device.
> As all IO is done via scattergather the memory footprint should be good.
> But I'm sure Christoph can tell you the glory details.

That is true, the request list and pdu is allocated upfront. If that is 
a problem, the pdu need not be allocated upfront but could be done at IO 
time instead. With that comes a bit more complicated retry handling, for 
memory shortage situations.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/