linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: EMU10K1: Deletion of unnecessary checks before three function calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5ha94839dx.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:45:30 +0100
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	trivial@...nel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: EMU10K1: Deletion of unnecessary checks before three function calls

At Sun, 02 Nov 2014 19:27:20 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> The functions kfree(), release_firmware() and snd_util_memhdr_free() test
> whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately. Thus the test
> around the call is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>

Your patch can't be applied cleanly due to your MUA breaking the
lines.  Please fix your MUA setup, or use an attachment if it's
impossible, and resend the patch.

Also, try to align the subject line with the relevant commits.  See
"git log sound/pci/emu10k1" 


thanks,

Takashi


> ---
>  sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c | 9 +++------
>  sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c        | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
> index 2292697..b4458a6 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
> @@ -1289,10 +1289,8 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_free(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu)
>  	}
>  	if (emu->emu1010.firmware_thread)
>  		kthread_stop(emu->emu1010.firmware_thread);
> -	if (emu->firmware)
> -		release_firmware(emu->firmware);
> -	if (emu->dock_fw)
> -		release_firmware(emu->dock_fw);
> +	release_firmware(emu->firmware);
> +	release_firmware(emu->dock_fw);
>  	if (emu->irq >= 0)
>  		free_irq(emu->irq, emu);
>  	/* remove reserved page */
> @@ -1301,8 +1299,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_free(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu)
>  			(struct snd_util_memblk *)emu->reserved_page);
>  		emu->reserved_page = NULL;
>  	}
> -	if (emu->memhdr)
> -		snd_util_memhdr_free(emu->memhdr);
> +	snd_util_memhdr_free(emu->memhdr);
>  	if (emu->silent_page.area)
>  		snd_dma_free_pages(&emu->silent_page);
>  	if (emu->ptb_pages.area)
> diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
> index 745f062..eb5c0ab 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c
> @@ -777,8 +777,7 @@ static void snd_emu10k1_ctl_private_free(struct snd_kcontrol
> *kctl)
>  	kctl->private_value = 0;
>  	list_del(&ctl->list);
>  	kfree(ctl);
> -	if (kctl->tlv.p)
> -		kfree(kctl->tlv.p);
> +	kfree(kctl->tlv.p);
>  }
> 
>  static int snd_emu10k1_add_controls(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu,
> -- 
> 2.1.3
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/