[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141103133953.3da4c209@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:39:53 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs tree
Hi Greg,
Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c between commits 8da673df2d77
("ll_get_child_fid(): callers already have the child") and ("kill
ll_unlink_generic()") from the vfs tree and commit 2a80f844158b
("Staging: lustre: llite: Declare ptr args correctly") from the staging
tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
index 8e926b385a60,2971a26370be..000000000000
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@@ -974,7 -1103,8 +974,7 @@@ out
* Instead, ll_ddelete() and ll_d_iput() will update it based upon if there
* is any lock existing. They will recycle dentries and inodes based upon locks
* too. b=20433 */
- static int ll_unlink(struct inode * dir, struct dentry *dentry)
-static int ll_unlink_generic(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dparent,
- struct dentry *dchild, struct qstr *name)
++static int ll_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
{
struct ptlrpc_request *request = NULL;
struct md_op_data *op_data;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists