linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141103123311.GJ11263@lukather>
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:33:11 +0100
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	lars@...afoo.de, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Antoine Ténart <antoine@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave_config API

Hi Nicolas,

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 28/10/2014 22:25, Maxime Ripard :
> > We are removing the dmaengine_device_control API, that shouldn't even have been
> > exposed in the first place. Change the callers to use the proper API.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> 
> Thanks, Maxime. Do I have to carry the patch myself or is it part of a
> series?

I think it would be better to keep it together with that serie, since
we're removing dmaengine_device_control in a latter patch. If it's ok
for you of course.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)