lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141103131111.GB29906@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:11:11 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf tools: Enhance the thread stack to output
 call/return data

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:09:45PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Enhance the thread stack to output detailed information
> about paired calls and returns.
> 
> The enhanced processing consumes sample information via
> thread_stack__process() and outputs information about
> paired calls / returns via a call-back.  While the
> call-back makes it possible for the facility to be used
> by arbitrary tools, a subsequent patch will provide the
> information to Python scripting via the db-export
> interface.
> 
> An important part of the call/return information is the
> call path which provides a structure that defines a context
> sensitive call graph.
> 
> Note that there are now two ways to use the thread stack.
> For simply providing a call stack (like you would get
> from the perf record -g option) the interface consists of
> thread_stack__event() and thread_stack__sample().  Whereas
> the enhanced interface consists of call_return_processor__new()
> and thread_stack__process().

the interface seems pretty separated, with clear in and out values,
so it should be fairly easy to write automated tests for that ;-)

also given that there's no real user of this interface at the moment,
it'd be really nice to have ;-) anyway

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ