linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: add helpers for group based drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbka+_=vd0uqoQM9c=Dy_DWcEersWAV5jvk2skKufjudw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:25:28 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: add helpers for group based drivers

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Antoine Tenart
<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com> wrote:

> Maybe the of_pinctrl_utils_node_is_mux/config() solution is more
> appropriate to avoid having a confusing function. Plus we would have a
> dedicated of_pinctrl_utils_read_pins() function.
>
> I think I prefer the second solution because it could avoid some
> confusion and the logic would stay in the pinctrl core functions.
>
> I'll cook up a new version if the of_pinctrl_utils_node_is_mux/config()
> is okay with you.

I'm following your idea and I agree. Let's see how that
looks.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/