linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: show output gpio state correctly on Intel Baytrail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdY8wPbfx-1fZ_PbY=F_+tRMg_Xe9B9uFKO5AfE5P7PB0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:33:15 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: show output gpio state correctly on
 Intel Baytrail

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> [Me]

>> But another way to get rid of the dilemma is to set
>> .suppress_bind_attrs = true on the .driver field of the
>> device driver. The one can't unbind it through sysfs anymore.
>>
>>         .driver = {
>>                 .name   = "foo",
>>                 .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>>         },
>>
>> So one of them need to be done.
>>
>> I suspect this is a kind of common problem...
>
> so instead of taking of taking a three-liner which just makes sure this
> can be used as "intended" you prefer to:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index e12e5b0..254ba81 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -587,16 +587,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id byt_gpio_acpi_match[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, byt_gpio_acpi_match);
>
> -static int byt_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> -       struct byt_gpio *vg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -
> -       pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> -       gpiochip_remove(&vg->chip);
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static struct platform_driver byt_gpio_driver = {
>         .probe          = byt_gpio_probe,
>         .remove         = byt_gpio_remove,
> @@ -605,6 +595,7 @@ static struct platform_driver byt_gpio_driver = {
>                 .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
>                 .pm     = &byt_gpio_pm_ops,
>                 .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(byt_gpio_acpi_match),
> +               .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>         },
>  };

I don't know, if the driver *really* cannot be removed from sysfs
it is actually the right solution don't you think?

Else we're just leaving a nicely designed self-destruct
mechanism around.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/