[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <100D68C7BA14664A8938383216E40DE0408298B7@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:36:02 +0000
From: "Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@...com>,
"Knippers, Linda" <linda.knippers@...com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] pmem: Add support for getgeo()
I agree that there should be a generic fake getgeo routine; but fixing that is a topic for a different patchset and it doesn't need to get folded into this driver submission process.
-----Original Message-----
From: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) [mailto:Elliott@...com]
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 8:28 PM
To: Ross Zwisler; Jens Axboe; Wilcox, Matthew R; Boaz Harrosh; Nick Piggin; Kani, Toshimitsu; Knippers, Linda; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] pmem: Add support for getgeo()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ross Zwisler
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 4:12 PM
> To: Jens Axboe; Matthew Wilcox; Boaz Harrosh; Nick Piggin; linux-
> fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> nvdimm@...ts.01.org
> Cc: Ross Zwisler
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] pmem: Add support for getgeo()
>
> Some programs require HDIO_GETGEO work, which requires we implement
> getgeo. Based off of the work done to the NVMe driver in this
> commit:
>
> commit 4cc09e2dc4cb ("NVMe: Add getgeo to block ops")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/pmem.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/pmem.c b/drivers/block/pmem.c
> index d366b9b..60bbe0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/pmem.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,15 @@ struct pmem_device {
> size_t size;
> };
>
> +static int pmem_getgeo(struct block_device *bd, struct hd_geometry
> *geo)
> +{
> + /* some standard values */
> + geo->heads = 1 << 6;
> + geo->sectors = 1 << 5;
> + geo->cylinders = get_capacity(bd->bd_disk) >> 11;
Just stuffing the result of get_capacity into the 16-bit
cylinders field will overflow/wrap on large capacities.
0xFFFF << 11 = 0x7FF_F800 = 64 GiB (68.7 GB)
How many programs still need these meaningless fields?
Could the bogus information be created elsewhere so
each block driver doesn't need to do this?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * direct translation from (pmem,sector) => void*
> * We do not require that sector be page aligned.
> @@ -176,6 +185,7 @@ out:
>
> static const struct block_device_operations pmem_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .getgeo = pmem_getgeo,
> };
>
> /* Kernel module stuff */
> --
---
Rob Elliott HP Server Storage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists