[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1415033687-23294-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:54:42 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Morten.Rasmussen@....com, kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: riel@...hat.com, efault@....de, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v9 05/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency
The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining compute
capacity for CFS tasks. This remaining capacity is the original capacity scaled
down by a factor (aka scale_rt_capacity). This estimation of available capacity
must also be invariant with frequency scaling.
A frequency scaling factor is applied on the running time of the RT tasks for
computing scale_rt_capacity.
In sched_rt_avg_update, we scale the RT execution time like below:
rq->rt_avg += rt_delta * arch_scale_freq_capacity() >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT
Then, scale_rt_capacity can be summarized by:
scale_rt_capacity = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE -
((rq->rt_avg << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) / period)
We can optimize by removing right and left shift in the computation of rq->rt_avg
and scale_rt_capacity
The call to arch_scale_frequency_capacity in the rt scheduling path might be
a concern for RT folks because I'm not sure whether we can rely on
arch_scale_freq_capacity to be short and efficient ?
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 +++++------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a5039da..b37c27b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5785,7 +5785,7 @@ unsigned long __weak arch_scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- u64 total, available, age_stamp, avg;
+ u64 total, used, age_stamp, avg;
s64 delta;
/*
@@ -5801,19 +5801,12 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
total = sched_avg_period() + delta;
- if (unlikely(total < avg)) {
- /* Ensures that capacity won't end up being negative */
- available = 0;
- } else {
- available = total - avg;
- }
+ used = div_u64(avg, total);
- if (unlikely((s64)total < SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE))
- total = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
+ if (likely(used < SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE))
+ return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - used;
- total >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
-
- return div_u64(available, total);
+ return 1;
}
static void update_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c34bd11..fc5b152 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1312,9 +1312,11 @@ static inline int hrtick_enabled(struct rq *rq)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq);
+extern unsigned long arch_scale_freq_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu);
+
static inline void sched_rt_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 rt_delta)
{
- rq->rt_avg += rt_delta;
+ rq->rt_avg += rt_delta * arch_scale_freq_capacity(NULL, cpu_of(rq));
sched_avg_update(rq);
}
#else
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists