[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141103173914.GZ10501@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:39:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] perf syscall error handling
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:12:18PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> I don't know if having an offset/mask helps much. Knowing your EINVAL
> comes from ->config is nice to know, but if there's 30 different ways
> to get an EINVAL from an improper config then you still can waste a lot
> of time narrowing things down.
>
> The string solution might be nice, but it is going to take major changes
> to the code and increase the size a bit. For example:
>
> $ cat arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf* kernel/events/* | grep EINVAL | wc -l
> 100
>
> And some of the code is passing the return values back through various
> long callchains (and overloaded pointers via casts) where it's not clear
> how you could also pass a string value.
Yes, nobody said this would be a quick and easy exercise. But I figure
something needs to happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists