[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411032052560.5308@nanos>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:54:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt-tester - move under selftests
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Andrew/Ingo/Thomas,
>
> You are all on the signed-off list for rt-tester. I have been poking
> around the source tree looking for existing test and came across rt-tester.
>
> What are your thoughts on rt-tester suitability to reside under
> tools/testing/selftest and becoming part of kselftest target?
> Would you like see it moved under the kselftest umbrella?
Sure you can move it, but it is broken and needs a complete
rewrite. So the proper solution is to remove it. I kept it there as a
reminder to fix it, but obviously I never managed to do so.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists