linux-kernel - Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141104035707.GA8718@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:57:07 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] remove .owner for most platform_drivers

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:54:41PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> as discussed at ELCE, here is my pull request for cleaning up all unneeded
> assignment of .owner for platform drivers. I used the following semantic patch
> to check that it only removes it when .owner gets initialized by the call to
> register the driver:

I've pulled this, and pushed it out in my driver-core-testing branch to
make sure nothing breaks.

Just to be sure, the 4 other patches you sent also need to go in here
for 3.19, right?  They were not included in this pull request?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/